成人抖阴

成人抖阴

New Law Center to Fight Illegal Family Separation by NYC Child Welfare Agencies

Protestors call to abolish the Administration for Children鈥檚 Services at a June 2020 rally in Brooklyn. (Erik McGregor/Getty Images)

Help fund stories like this.

In New York City and across the U.S., David Shalleck-Klein believes child welfare agencies routinely violate the Constitution by carrying out unlawful searches and family separations 鈥 with disastrous consequences for the low-income Black and Hispanic families they disproportionately investigate.

Having worked for five years as an attorney at , he would repeatedly see the Administration for Children鈥檚 Services, NYC鈥檚 child welfare agency, 鈥渂latantly violating family鈥檚 rights,鈥 he said. 

They would intimidate families to gain entry into their homes, he said, conduct intrusive searches, including asking children to take off their clothes to look for bruises and, in the most dire cases, separate youth from their parents without judicial approval by acting under what鈥檚 known as emergency removal powers. Yet in hundreds of instances each year, according to city data, judges would then deem the agency鈥檚 use of those emergency powers unlawful.

The attorney last week launched what he says is the nation鈥檚 first civil rights organization dedicated to fighting back against such violations: the . 

There鈥檚 a long tradition of groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union or the NAACP Legal Defense Fund bringing lawsuits against alleged government wrongdoing, but 鈥渢here’s no comparison to the child welfare system for when families鈥 rights are violated,鈥 said Shalleck-Klein.

鈥淭his is the first organization in the country that is going to be dedicated to going on the offense and suing government agencies when they violate families鈥 rights,鈥 he told 成人抖阴. 鈥淲e’re filling a gaping hole in advocacy for parents.鈥

The Center will bring cases against ACS including alleged Fourth Amendment violations for illegal searches and seizures, he said. It will seek financial penalties to compensate families for their damages and will request injunctions against ACS practices it says are illegal.

鈥淭hey鈥檙e not going to just get a slap on the wrist. They鈥檙e very literally going to have to pay for their mistakes,鈥 said Shalleck-Klein.

鈥淭hese types of lawsuits are hard,鈥 he admits, but said he鈥檚 confident that 鈥渨e鈥檙e going to be able to have not just success for individual clients, but also transformative systems change success.鈥

As many as are the subject of ACS investigations each year, 87% of whom are Black or Hispanic. Although 23% of youth in the city are Black, they make up removed from their families and placed in foster care. 

In 2019, out of more than 1,750 emergency family separations, were immediately rejected by a Family Court judge and still more were thrown out in the days and weeks to come 鈥 meaning hundreds of children were unnecessarily put through the trauma of family separation, which studies show is associated with .

David Shalleck-Klein (Bronx Defenders)

鈥淲hen ACS removes a child from a parent without a court order, if they did not have legal justification for that [removal], that is a constitutional violation,鈥 said Shalleck-Klein. 鈥淲e know that it is happening routinely.鈥

鈥淎CS follows federal, state and city laws, and respects the constitutional rights of parents and children,鈥 an ACS spokesperson said in an email to 成人抖阴, adding that the agency 鈥渋s committed to being responsive to the needs of children and families.鈥 ACS is required by law to investigate all reports it receives, the spokesperson said, noting that the total number of children entering foster care since 2017 has dropped by more than a third. 

Fewer than 2% of ACS investigations in 2021 resulted in child separation, the agency said.

鈥淚t is deeply concerning to us,鈥 the spokesperson added, 鈥渢hat, year after year, there are dramatic racial and ethnic disparities in the reports ACS receives from the state.鈥

The agency is working to provide child care professionals with implicit bias trainings and education on ways to support families without calling the state鈥檚 child abuse hotline, it said.

Across the country, Black youth are to experience a child welfare investigation, with 53% of all Black Americans undergoing the experience before they turn 18. Even if the investigations find no evidence of abuse or neglect, charges can remain on parents鈥 records for years, jeopardizing job prospects in fields like education and child care. 

Meanwhile, many white families hardly feel the presence of child protective services at all. A former ACS caseworker spoke with in 2020, relaying that, once, when she was looking for an elusive parent, she saw a white woman nearby and asked if she knew the parent鈥檚 whereabouts. The neighbor had never even heard of the caseworker鈥檚 agency.

鈥淚 never met one single Black family that asked me, 鈥榃hat鈥檚 ACS?鈥欌 the caseworker reflected. 鈥淭here鈥檚 one group of people walking around not knowing that ACS exists, and there鈥檚 another group of people walking around living in fear of ACS.鈥

In fall 2020, Harlem community advocate Joyce McMillan interviewed New York City residents in majority-Black, Hispanic and Asian-American neighborhoods about their experiences with the agency and turned their responses into posters that now hang throughout the city.

鈥淭hey tore my family apart,鈥 one parent said.

鈥淚 felt like the police had come to my house once ACS came because they investigated my household like the police,鈥 said another.

JMacForFamilies

Out of the 500 residents to whom McMillan spoke, all but two or three, she said, knew about the agency. Youth and parents alike were haunted by their experiences, she said.

鈥淔or children, ACS is like the boogeyman. They run and hide when ACS knocks on the door. They think they’re going to be taken away from their parents,鈥 explained McMillan, who is executive director of . Her organization seeks to abolish what it calls the 鈥渇amily regulation system鈥 and calls for the government to support rather than punish families living in poverty. She now sits on the Family Justice Law Center鈥檚 community advisory board.

Joyce McMillan at a June 2020 march in Brooklyn to defund ACS. (Erik McGregor/Getty Images)

The new legal organization, she told 成人抖阴, will be a game-changer for families, finally giving them the opportunity to fight back when they believe their rights are violated.

鈥淔amilies will have resources to deal with the harm,鈥 she said. 鈥淎CS, we call them the family police for a reason. 鈥 Until the cameras started rolling, people didn’t believe that Black people got shot in the back and weren鈥檛 actually carrying a gun. And it’s the same thing with ACS. So I hope that this work that’s being done will bring out the truth.鈥

Attorney David Bloomfield, who represented NYC as an assistant corporation counsel, said 鈥渙n a case-by-case basis, I think there are winnable situations of improper separation,鈥 but system injunctions against ACS might be a 鈥渉eavier lift.鈥

Still, the Brooklyn College and CUNY Graduate Center law professor said 鈥渋t can have a chilling effect on improper conduct if there鈥檚 able counsel for the families.鈥

The Family Justice Law Center has been selected for in-kind funding and guidance from the Urban Justice Center鈥檚 program. Legal scholars from Stanford, Harvard, New York University and other institutions sit on its academic advisory board.

ACS obtains court permission to enter homes in of all investigations. In most other searches, parents give the caseworker verbal permission to enter their space. But if a caseworker bangs on the door saying that they will return with the police if the family doesn鈥檛 let them in, and if the parents don鈥檛 know their legal rights, 鈥淲as that really a voluntary entry into the home?鈥 asks Shalleck-Klein.

鈥淸Child protective services] may seek the assistance of the police if CPS determine that immediate protective measures are necessary,鈥 the agency said.

Similarly, of emergency child removals get immediately struck down by a Family Court judge. While the emergency removal power is vital when youth are in imminent danger, said the attorney, its abuse can represent an unconstitutional seizure.

鈥淎CS knows there’s no consequence for them doing something illegal,鈥 he said. 鈥淚f they violate families鈥 rights, what happens is that the child is returned home. But there’s nothing in the moment stopping them or giving them any pause from conducting an emergency removal when there’s not just cause.鈥

鈥淲e hope that the [Family Justice Law Center] will inject more accountability into the process,鈥 he continued, 鈥渂ecause they are now put on notice that they can’t act with impunity and their illegal actions will be challenged in court.鈥

Shalleck-Klein hopes the Center鈥檚 work will lead to fewer children in the foster care system and shorter durations for those who are, while not worsening, or even decreasing, the rates of child maltreatment. 鈥淚n other words, keeping as many children home safely with their parents as we can,鈥 he said.

The goal parallels the impacts of other changes in the Family Court system. When the legal team representing defendant parents includes social work staff and parent advocates, foster stays were significantly reduced with no change in child safety outcomes, a 2019 NYU found. And similarly, pilot programs that boosted legal defense for families led to major savings for municipalities by avoiding costly foster care when poverty-induced issues might otherwise have been mistaken for parental neglect, a 2020 from Casey Family Programs revealed.

McMillan hopes the plan succeeds, not just for the children who might avoid unneeded family separation, but also for those who indeed are suffering from abuse at home.

If ACS spends less time mistaking poverty-related issues for abusive parenting, 鈥渢hen maybe they will focus on children who actually need help,鈥 said the advocate.

Help fund stories like this.

Republish This Article

We want our stories to be shared as widely as possible 鈥 for free.

Please view 成人抖阴's republishing terms.





On 成人抖阴 Today